Chief Judge Janet DiFiore announced on Tuesday (February 6) in her State of Our Judiciary Address, that the Appellate Divisions in all four Departments will be rolling out electronic filing rules for certain cases. Of particular interest to commercial litigators is the First and Fourth Departments, in which the rule announcement specifically identifies commercial
Farrell Fritz P.C.
Content Developer Attempts to Tag MLB with Conversion: “Safe,” Rules Justice Kornreich
Have you ever had a brilliant business idea, only to discover years later that someone else has beaten you to market? If you are a professional athlete, you might break your hand punching a fire extinguisher or picture frame in frustration. If you are a web developer, you might indignantly exclaim, “They literally stole…
Which Statute of Limitations Applies to Your Declaratory Judgment Action?
So your client wants you to file a declaratory judgment action, but you are unsure of whether the applicable statute of limitations has expired. But what is the applicable statute of limitations in a declaratory judgment action? Since there is no limitations period specifically addressed to the declaratory judgment action, it generally falls under the…
Defamation Claims Against Gemological Institute Doomed: Qualified Privilege Shield Is Stronger Than A Diamond
“Diamonds are nothing more than chunks of coal that stuck to their jobs,” said Malcom Forbes. An industry that generates over $13 billion annually, diamonds are considered one of the world’s major natural resources. Critical to the integrity of the market are reports or certificates that grade the quality of the stones…
A Reminder for Non-Resident Attorneys Seeking to Practice in New York: Be Sure to Comply with Judiciary Law § 470!
This week, we examine the answer to a simple question: may an out-of-state lawyer serve as counsel in a New York state court procee
ding absent making a motion for admission pro hac vice? To answer this slightly ambiguously worded question, we need more information. Specifically, the answer depends on the meaning of “out-of-state”…
Proposed Amendment to Commercial Division Rule 11-g Seeks to Add Clawback Language to Standard Confidentiality Order
Disclosure of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) has become a staple in commercial cases. Of course, with the vast number of documents and ESI being reviewed and the increased complexity in the review process, the risk of inadvertent production of privileged information is at its highest. The inadvertent production of privileged material often leads to lengthy,…
Attorneys Switching Sides During Litigation Sometimes Allowed… at least in the First Department!
Notwithstanding general public opinion of attorney ethics, most people (including attorneys) believe that an attorney cannot dump a client in the middle of litigation to represent the other side. However, attorneys in the First Department may be surprised to learn that, in certain circumstances, a representation adverse to their former clients, even in litigation arising…
Is it a Privilege to Speak With a PR Consultant? Maybe Not for Kesha!
So you were just retained on what could become a high-profile case. The stakes are high, and it’s unclear how this will play in the media. The issue may arise based on the parties to the case, the nature of the claims, or both. Either way, as part of your litigation strategy, you decide that…
To Demand or Not Demand, “Futility” is the Question
Under Delaware law, the decision to commence litigation on behalf of a corporation is, of course, a fundamental exercise of business judgment, which decision rests with the Board of Directors. A shareholder, therefore, cannot bring a derivative action without pleading that a demand on the corporation to do so had been made, or that…
Is Customer Information a Trade Secret? Not So Fast!
Under what circumstances do customer information and business operations constitute “trade secrets” that may be enjoined from use by a former employee ? A recent decision by Justice Elizabeth H. Emerson on this issue serves as a stark reminder that a preliminary injunction requires “clear and convincing” proof that the information is truly a secret.…